Why read this: This article gives B2 readers a clear way into one of the biggest science stories of the year: why 2025 was so hot, even though scientists expected it to cool down. The writer keeps the original argument that warming may be speeding up, but builds it from shorter sentences and friendlier vocabulary. Students get useful practice with cause-and-effect language, with hedged predictions, and with a real-world topic they will meet often in school and in the news.
What to notice: Notice how the writer first sets up an expectation (2025 should have been cooler) and then surprises the reader with what actually happened. Look for places where the writer hedges instead of stating things as facts—words like "may", "could", "likely" and "suggests". The sulphate paragraph is the hardest passage: stop and check that you understand how cleaner air can cause more warming. Also watch the closing quote from Carlo Buontempo, which shifts the article from facts into a prediction about the future.
Skills practised: Readers practise tracking a multi-step argument across paragraphs, identifying cause and effect inside long sentences, and recognising hedged language as a sign of careful scientific reasoning. They also work on holding numbers in working memory (1.15°C, 1.44°C, 1.5°C, 2°C) and comparing them, and on reading a counter-example (the climate hiatus) without losing the main thread. Margin glosses support the most domain-specific terms, leaving cognitive room for the argument itself.
Why 2025 Was So Hot, Even Without El Niño
Scientists expected a cooler year. Instead, the planet kept heating—and the reasons say something serious about the decade ahead.
Tap any green word in the article to see its meaning.
The year 2025 should have been a slightly cooler one. Instead, it ended up as the third hottest year ever recorded. This week, the main climate-monitoring groups in Europe and America released their yearly reports, and the message was the same in each one: the Earth is warming faster than before.
All eleven of the past eleven years are the warmest since records began, and the top three spots all belong to the most recent three. The hottest of all was 2024, which lined up with a strong El Niño—a Pacific Ocean pattern that pushes temperatures upward—and with the brightest point of the . In 2025 that El Niño and was replaced by its opposite, La Niña, which usually cools the planet down.
By every reasonable expectation, 2025 should have been clearly cooler than 2024. It was—but only slightly. Compared to other La Niña years, it was extraordinary. The last La Niña year, 2022, was 1.15°C warmer than the world's average. Last year was 1.44°C warmer, according to the World Meteorological Organisation. The average warming over the past three years has sat between 1.48°C and 1.5°C—almost touching the limit set in the Paris agreement.
Many scientists are still cautious about announcing that warming is speeding up. They remember the early 2000s, when global temperatures stayed lower than the climate models predicted. That period was nicknamed the , and at the time, some people argued that climate change had stopped. In reality, several natural cycles had simply combined to cool things briefly before warming continued.
Today, however, several signs point to a real acceleration. The first is the most obvious one: , especially carbon dioxide, are still rising rather than falling. The second is more surprising. A different kind of pollution—tiny sulphate particles released by ships and coal-fired power plants—is now decreasing because of stricter rules on air quality. Sulphates are dangerous for human health, so removing them is good news. But they also reflect sunlight back into space, so cleaner air actually allows more heat to reach the Earth's surface.
There is also a growing debate about how strongly the climate reacts to extra greenhouse gases. A new study from the University of Exeter suggests this reaction may be at the higher end of what scientists thought possible. If the study is correct, global temperatures could pass 2°C by the middle of this century. That matters because climate models show the danger of —sudden, hard-to-reverse changes—rises sharply once warming goes beyond 1.5°C.
The extremes of 2025 made the year stand out further. In February, sea ice at both poles dropped to its lowest level since satellite measurements began in the late 1970s, and Antarctica had its hottest year on record. In Europe, hot and windy conditions spread wildfires across Spain and Portugal in late summer. These fires released nearly 14 million tonnes of carbon—more than any year before—and added black soot that absorbs even more sunlight.
If the trend of the past 30 years continues, the world could cross the 1.5°C limit before the end of this decade. Carlo Buontempo, who runs Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service, says the question is no longer whether we will pass 1.5°C, but how we will manage life beyond it. Forecasters already expect El Niño to return later this year, so 2026 is likely to add yet another hot year to the list.
The year 2025 should have been a slightly cooler one. Instead, it ended up as the third hottest year ever recorded. This week, the main climate-monitoring groups in Europe and America released their yearly reports, and the message was the same in each one: the Earth is warming faster than before.
All eleven of the past eleven years are the warmest since records began, and the top three spots all belong to the most recent three. The hottest of all was 2024, which lined up with a strong El Niño—a Pacific Ocean pattern that pushes temperatures upward—and with the brightest point of the . In 2025 that El Niño and was replaced by its opposite, La Niña, which usually cools the planet down.
By every reasonable expectation, 2025 should have been clearly cooler than 2024. It was—but only slightly. Compared to other La Niña years, it was extraordinary. The last La Niña year, 2022, was 1.15°C warmer than the world's average. Last year was 1.44°C warmer, according to the World Meteorological Organisation. The average warming over the past three years has sat between 1.48°C and 1.5°C—almost touching the limit set in the Paris agreement.
Many scientists are still cautious about announcing that warming is speeding up. They remember the early 2000s, when global temperatures stayed lower than the climate models predicted. That period was nicknamed the , and at the time, some people argued that climate change had stopped. In reality, several natural cycles had simply combined to cool things briefly before warming continued.
Today, however, several signs point to a real acceleration. The first is the most obvious one: , especially carbon dioxide, are still rising rather than falling. The second is more surprising. A different kind of pollution—tiny sulphate particles released by ships and coal-fired power plants—is now decreasing because of stricter rules on air quality. Sulphates are dangerous for human health, so removing them is good news. But they also reflect sunlight back into space, so cleaner air actually allows more heat to reach the Earth's surface.
There is also a growing debate about how strongly the climate reacts to extra greenhouse gases. A new study from the University of Exeter suggests this reaction may be at the higher end of what scientists thought possible. If the study is correct, global temperatures could pass 2°C by the middle of this century. That matters because climate models show the danger of —sudden, hard-to-reverse changes—rises sharply once warming goes beyond 1.5°C.
The extremes of 2025 made the year stand out further. In February, sea ice at both poles dropped to its lowest level since satellite measurements began in the late 1970s, and Antarctica had its hottest year on record. In Europe, hot and windy conditions spread wildfires across Spain and Portugal in late summer. These fires released nearly 14 million tonnes of carbon—more than any year before—and added black soot that absorbs even more sunlight.
If the trend of the past 30 years continues, the world could cross the 1.5°C limit before the end of this decade. Carlo Buontempo, who runs Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service, says the question is no longer whether we will pass 1.5°C, but how we will manage life beyond it. Forecasters already expect El Niño to return later this year, so 2026 is likely to add yet another hot year to the list.
Questions
Check your understanding
- 01
According to the article, why was 2025 expected to be a cooler year than 2024?
- 02
Reread the paragraph about sulphate particles. Why does removing them from the air cause more warming?
- 03
What is the main idea the article is building towards?
- 04
How does the writer use the example of the early-2000s climate hiatus to shape the argument of the article?
Suggested length: ~80 words
- 05
Evaluate how convincing the article's claim is that the world will pass the 1.5°C limit before the end of this decade.
Suggested length: ~80 words
Questions
Check your understanding
- 01
According to the article, why was 2025 expected to be a cooler year than 2024?
- 02
Reread the paragraph about sulphate particles. Why does removing them from the air cause more warming?
- 03
What is the main idea the article is building towards?
- 04
How does the writer use the example of the early-2000s climate hiatus to shape the argument of the article?
Suggested length: ~80 words
- 05
Evaluate how convincing the article's claim is that the world will pass the 1.5°C limit before the end of this decade.
Suggested length: ~80 words