Teacher's Note

Why read this: Big tech companies say AI is the reason for recent layoffs, but the real picture is more mixed. This article gives B2 readers a chance to look at how a public message from a company can differ from what the data shows. It also introduces students to ideas they will meet often in news reports about work and technology, such as AI-exposed jobs, profit margins and workforce reductions.

What to notice: Notice how the writer first agrees that part of the AI story is true, and then shows where the evidence does not match the company message. Pay attention to hedging words like 'may', 'suggests' and 'however' which signal that the writer is being careful, not certain. The Meta example is the clearest moment in the article: the company is laying off staff and at the same time spending US$600 billion on AI, which raises a question about who is really paying for the AI bet.

Skills practised: Students practise tracking a two-sided argument across several paragraphs and using cited evidence (Anthropic, Goldman Sachs, PwC) to test a claim. They practise reading hedged language at B2, where 'may' and 'suggests' carry meaning, not weakness. They also practise reading short numerical claims in context, such as the 2.5% at-risk figure, the 20% Meta layoff and the 56% wage premium for AI-skilled workers.

Level: B2 · Length: ~550 words · Reading time: ~3 min
Graded ReadingB2

Tech companies say AI is taking jobs. The story is more complicated.

Atlassian, Amazon and Meta all blame AI for layoffs. The numbers suggest other reasons may also be at work.

~3 min read·

Tap any green word in the article to see its meaning.

Over the past few months, several large tech: Technology, especially as applied to a particular industry; a technology company or sector — 科技 companies have announced big staff cuts: reductions in the number of workers a company keeps — 裁员. They say the reason is artificial: Made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally — 人造的;人工的 intelligence. Atlassian, Block and Amazon have all said they will lay off: to end workers' jobs because the company no longer needs them — 解雇 thousands of workers because they are using AI more.

The message from these companies is simple. AI can now do work that people used to do, so fewer workers are needed. However, the evidence tells a more careful story.

Part of the AI story is true

There are real changes in some parts of the job market, but the size of the change is often exaggerated. Research from Anthropic, published this month, shows that AI can do many work tasks. Yet most of those tasks are still done mainly by people, not by AI tools.

Some jobs face more pressure than others. Computer programmers are at the top of the list, followed by customer service workers and data entry staff. even: Exactly, just, fully — 正好 in these jobs, however, AI is still used in a limited: Restricted in size, amount, or extent. — 有限的;受限制的 way.

A 2025 Goldman Sachs report estimate: To calculate roughly, often from imperfect data — 估计 that if companies used AI for everything it can currently do, about 2.5% of US jobs would be at risk. That is not a small number. However, the report also notes that workers in AI-exposed: (of jobs or industries) likely to be affected by AI tools — 易受AI冲击的 jobs are not yet more likely to lose their jobs or earn less than other workers.

The report does see some early stress: Discomfort — 不适,不舒服 in certain industries. Marketing, graphic: Relating to visual art or design; giving vividly explicit detail. — 图形的;生动的 design, office work and call centres are growing more slowly than before. In the US tech sector: A distinct area or part of something, especially of a country's economy or society — 部门;行业;领域, young workers in their 20s in AI-exposed jobs saw unemployment rise by almost 3% in early 2025. These are real signals, but they are limited to specific sector: A distinct area or part of something, especially of a country's economy or society — 部门;行业;领域. They are not the wide loss of jobs that company announcements often suggest.

So what else might be going on?

The other reasons companies are letting people go

The timing: The choice, judgement, or control of when something should be done. — 时机;时间选择 of these layoffs: the act of dismissing workers because the company has less work or money — 裁员 is interesting. Many tech firm: A business or company, especially a small one. — 公司;商行 hired too many people during the post-pandemic boom: the rise in business activity that came after the COVID-19 pandemic — 疫情后繁荣期, when online services were in high demand: An insistent request; the desire of consumers for a particular product or service. — 需求;要求. investor: A person or organisation that puts money into financial schemes or businesses with the expectation of profit. — 投资者 are also pushing companies to improve profit margins: the share of money a company keeps as profit after paying its costs — 利润率. These pressures exist alongside: Next to or together with; at the same time as. — 在…旁边;与…一起 the real progress: To move forward or develop towards a better or more advanced state. — 进展;进步 in AI, but they are rarely mentioned together.

There is also a strong financial reason for companies to look like they are using AI. Since ChatGPT launch: To start or set in motion something new; to send a spacecraft into the air. — 发起;推出;发射 in 2022, AI-related stock: A supply of goods kept for sale; shares in a company; an amount available for use. — 库存;股票;储备 have driven about 75% of the gains in the S&P 500. A workforce reduction: a cut in the number of people a company employs — 裁员 linked to AI sounds better to investors than a simple cost cut.

Meta is a good example. The company is reportedly: According to reports or rumors; supposedly — 据报道 planning to lay off as much as 20% of its staff. At the same time, it has promised to spend US$600 billion on data centres: large buildings full of computer servers, often used to run AI — 数据中心 and top AI researchers. The workers losing their jobs are not really being replaced by AI today. They may be paying for the AI bet: a large, risky investment a company makes, hoping AI will pay off in the future — AI豪赌 that Meta is making on the future.

The bigger picture

A recent PwC report suggests that jobs are still growing in most industries that use AI, just more slowly. wages: [Algebra] Daily or weekly pay — 薪水 (日薪/周薪) are also rising faster in those industries, and workers with AI skills earn about 56% more on average.

The big picture: the overall situation, when small details are set aside — 总体形势, then, may not be mass displacement: the loss of jobs across many industries at the same time — 大规模失业. It may be a workplace: A place where people work, such as an office or factory. — 工作场所;职场 where AI tools change what people do, rather than replace them completely.

Questions

Check your understanding

  1. 01

    According to the article, what do Atlassian, Block and Amazon say is the main reason for their layoffs?

  2. 02

    What does the 2025 Goldman Sachs report suggest about workers in AI-exposed jobs today?

  3. 03

    What does the example of Meta suggest about some current layoffs?

  4. 04

    How does the writer use the example of Meta to question the idea that AI is the main cause of recent layoffs?

    Suggested length: ~80 words

  5. 05

    How does the article suggest that AI may change the workplace, even if it does not cause mass displacement?

    Suggested length: ~80 words