Why read this: This feature opens a door onto a labour market your students are about to enter. It uses two real jobseekers, three industry experts, and macro data from the US, UK, and Canada to ask a question students rarely see posed in textbooks: when finding work becomes hard, who profits from the difficulty? Reading at C1 lets the class engage with feature journalism on its own terms, tracking five distinct voices, weighing competing claims about AI and the labour market, and noticing how a writer can present a debate without ever settling it.
What to notice: Three things repay close attention. First, the multi-voice structure: Ventola and Duncan are jobseekers paying for tools, while D'Onofrio, Gable, and Groom are industry insiders, and the writer lets their views collide rather than reconcile them. Second, the dense Tier 3 vocabulary clustered around the labour market itself, including candidate market, employer-driven market, premium subscriber, hiring managers, and burnout candidates, which carries the article's argument as much as the statistics do. Third, the closing hedge from Ventola: 'if I measure them strictly in dollars'. That single qualifier reframes everything she has said about her $6,000 outlay, and students who read literally will miss the rhetorical move entirely.
Skills practised: Tracking who-said-what across a quote-driven feature; distinguishing macro evidence (national unemployment data) from micro evidence (one person's spending); reading hedged claims, particularly modal and adverbial qualifiers such as 'strictly', 'roughly', and 'less likely to be replaced'; weighing competing expert opinions without reducing them to a single answer; and recognising the conventions of business journalism, which presents a debate, supplies the evidence, and leaves the verdict to the reader.
How job hunting became an expensive business
With work hard to come by on both sides of the Atlantic, applicants are pouring money into premium subscriptions, AI tools, and career coaches, raising an awkward question: does any of it actually pay off?
Tap any green word in the article to see its meaning.
Giovanna Ventola, 35, of North Carolina, reckons she has spent close to $6,000 on job hunting: the activity of looking for a new job — 求职;找工作. Software for polishing her resume, interview-training courses, recruitment site subscription: a paid plan that gives full access to a job-search website — 招聘网站会员订阅, premium access: a paid level of service that gives more features than the free level — 高级会员权限;付费访问 to job-search platforms: each line item felt like a sensible investment in a market where applicants are increasingly turning to: starting to use (something) for help — 转而使用;求助于 paid tools to secure work: successfully obtain a job — 获得工作. “I was doing more than just submitting applications,” explains Ventola, who has been chasing roles in commercial real estate: the business of buying, selling, and renting property used for businesses (offices, shops, etc.) — 商业地产. With jobs hard to come by: difficult to find or obtain — 难以找到;不易得到 on both sides of the Atlantic: in both North America and Europe — 在大西洋两岸(即北美和欧洲), she is one of a growing cohortcohort: A group of people supporting the same thing or person — 支持者群体 of jobseekersjobseeker: a person who is looking for a job — 求职者 learning that to stand out from the crowd: be noticeably better or different from the many other people doing the same thing — 脱颖而出 now carries a real price tag.
Recruiters trace the trend to a sluggishsluggish: Habitually idle and lazy; slothful; dull; inactive — 懒散的;迟钝的 labour market. In the United States, the average unemployed worker now needs roughly six months to land a new role, up from five last year. Canada shedshed: to get rid of something unwanted; to cause blood, tears, or light to flow or fall — 去除;流(泪);脱落;散发(光) 66,000 jobs in a single August, lifting its unemployment rate to 7.1%. British job vacancies fell by another 9,000, or 1.3%, in the three months to September, the thirty-ninth consecutiveconsecutive: Following each other continuously without interruption; in unbroken sequence. — 连续的;不间断的 quarterly decline. The knock-on effect: an indirect result that follows from one event causing another — 连锁反应;间接影响 is visible on the platforms themselves: LinkedIn told the BBC that its premium subscriber: a person paying for the higher-tier paid plan of a service — 付费会员 base has grown almost 50% in two years, and roughly 40% of those subscribers now lean on AI features: tools inside a product that use artificial intelligence — AI(人工智能)功能 to refine their profiles.
Across the Atlantic, Kaycia Duncan, 30, has spent more than a year hunting for marketing work from her home in Buckinghamshire. She finds the silence dishearteningdisheartening: making someone lose hope or confidence — 令人沮丧的;让人灰心的, evidence of how punishing the market has become. Like Ventola, she invests roughly £30 a month in tools she hopes will sharpen her job prospects: the chances of getting a good job in the future — 就业前景: a premium service that lets her message HR managers: people in charge of hiring at a company; HR stands for Human Resources — 人力资源经理(HR) directly, plus a graphic-design subscription for producing polished CVs and portfolio work: examples of past projects shown to potential employers — 作品集;展示作品. While she waits, she has taken on temp work: short-term jobs that fill a gap until a permanent job is found — 临时工作;零工 and launched a YouTube channel chroniclingchronicle: to record in or as in a chronicle — 记录;编年史般记述 her search. Two hundred applications in, she still believes the spending was justified.
With interviews proving elusive: turning out to be hard to get or achieve — 难以求得;屡屡碰壁, Ventola took to TikTok last year, partly to externaliseexternalise: to make something external or objective — 使外在化;具象化 her own troubleshooting and partly because she suspected, correctly, that she was not alone. Her clips quickly began to rack up: build up a large number or amount of (something) — 累积;攒下(数量) hundreds of comments from other jobseekers in the same bindbind: A troublesome situation; a problem; a predicament or quandary — 困境;窘境. That response provided the spark: gave the first push that started something — 成为契机;点燃了灵感 for Rhize, the not-for-profit: (of an organization) run for a purpose other than making money — 非营利的 community she founded so job hunters could swap notes on which paid tools actually deliver. Membership has climbed past 4,000, roughly 80% in the US.
Industry observers read these stories as symptoms of a deeper rebalancingrebalancing: The act or process of restoring balance — 再平衡;重新调整. “We have seen the shift from a candidate market: a job market in which workers have the upper hand because employers compete for them — 求职者市场(求职者占主导) in the past three years, to more of an employer-driven market: a job market in which employers have the upper hand because there are more workers than open jobs — 雇主主导的市场,” says Nancy D'Onofrio, a Toronto-based director at Randstad, the multinational HR and staffing company: a company that helps other companies find workers — 人力资源外包公司;人才招聘公司. “There are far less opportunities and far more available talent, so it's a really competitive job search: a job hunt with many other strong candidates competing for the same roles — 竞争激烈的求职.” D'Onofrio points to: names (something) as a cause or example — 指出;归因于 advances in AI as a key driver, an analysis echoedecho: To repeat or reflect an idea, opinion, or sound, often in agreement or as a reverberation. — 回响;附和;重复 by Nicole Gable of LHH North America, who attributesattribute: To ascribe (something) to a given cause, reason etc — 归因于;归咎于 the volatilityvolatility: The state of being volatile — 不稳定性 to “the rapid explosion of technology: the very fast growth and spread of new technology — 技术的迅猛发展”. Few employers, Gable adds, can confidently name the skills they will need five years out.
The uncertainty has been good for career coach: a trained professional who advises someone on their career and job search — 职业教练;职业顾问. Miriam Groom, who runs a practice in Canada, says her client roster has expanded exponentiallyexponentially: Rapidly, greatly — 急剧地;飞速地. Once dominated by burnout candidates: people who feel exhausted and unhappy from too much work — 身心倦怠的求职者;工作疲惫的人, her caseloadcaseload: The workload of a person or group that handles cases; the relative volume of cases expected to be worked upon — 案件量 now splits roughly 50/50 between the burnt-out and those displaceddisplace: To force someone or something from its usual place or position; to take over the role of something. — 取代;使流离失所;移位 by layoffslayoff: A period of time when someone is unavailable for work — 休工期;停工期. She is also seeing a spike in: a sudden sharp increase in (something) — (数量的)激增;骤增 clients trying to retrainretrain: learn new skills so as to do a different job — 重新培训;转岗培训 for roles less likely to be replaced by technology, mapping current skills against jobs expected to be in demand: wanted by many employers; needed in the market — 受市场欢迎的;有需求的 for the next two decades. Sometimes, she says, the kindest advice is to abandon a target role and steer toward a different sector with stronger demand.
D'Onofrio doubts that paid tools are the answer. Her advice is unflashyunflashy: Not flashy — 不张扬的;朴实的: contact hiring managers: people inside a company who decide who to interview and hire — 招聘经理(决定面试和录用的人) directly, attend networking events: events where people meet to make professional contacts — 职业社交活动, and use the free resume-strengthening utilitiesutility: A software program designed to perform a single task or a small range of tasks, often to help manage and tune computer hardware, an operating system or application software already online. She also urges candidates to watch for scams: stay alert for dishonest schemes — 警惕骗局 when approached by career coaches or self-styled CV experts, and to investigate anyone thoroughly before handing over money. Ventola herself ends on a similar hedge. “Honestly, I don't think any of my investments were worth it if I measure them strictly in dollars,” she admits. “But what they did do was open my eyes to adjacent opportunities: chances in related but different fields or roles — 相邻领域的机会, and push me to think outside the box: think in a creative way that goes beyond the usual approach — 跳出固有思维;创新思考.”
Giovanna Ventola, 35, of North Carolina, reckons she has spent close to $6,000 on job hunting: the activity of looking for a new job — 求职;找工作. Software for polishing her resume, interview-training courses, recruitment site subscription: a paid plan that gives full access to a job-search website — 招聘网站会员订阅, premium access: a paid level of service that gives more features than the free level — 高级会员权限;付费访问 to job-search platforms: each line item felt like a sensible investment in a market where applicants are increasingly turning to: starting to use (something) for help — 转而使用;求助于 paid tools to secure work: successfully obtain a job — 获得工作. “I was doing more than just submitting applications,” explains Ventola, who has been chasing roles in commercial real estate: the business of buying, selling, and renting property used for businesses (offices, shops, etc.) — 商业地产. With jobs hard to come by: difficult to find or obtain — 难以找到;不易得到 on both sides of the Atlantic: in both North America and Europe — 在大西洋两岸(即北美和欧洲), she is one of a growing cohortcohort: A group of people supporting the same thing or person — 支持者群体 of jobseekersjobseeker: a person who is looking for a job — 求职者 learning that to stand out from the crowd: be noticeably better or different from the many other people doing the same thing — 脱颖而出 now carries a real price tag.
Recruiters trace the trend to a sluggishsluggish: Habitually idle and lazy; slothful; dull; inactive — 懒散的;迟钝的 labour market. In the United States, the average unemployed worker now needs roughly six months to land a new role, up from five last year. Canada shedshed: to get rid of something unwanted; to cause blood, tears, or light to flow or fall — 去除;流(泪);脱落;散发(光) 66,000 jobs in a single August, lifting its unemployment rate to 7.1%. British job vacancies fell by another 9,000, or 1.3%, in the three months to September, the thirty-ninth consecutiveconsecutive: Following each other continuously without interruption; in unbroken sequence. — 连续的;不间断的 quarterly decline. The knock-on effect: an indirect result that follows from one event causing another — 连锁反应;间接影响 is visible on the platforms themselves: LinkedIn told the BBC that its premium subscriber: a person paying for the higher-tier paid plan of a service — 付费会员 base has grown almost 50% in two years, and roughly 40% of those subscribers now lean on AI features: tools inside a product that use artificial intelligence — AI(人工智能)功能 to refine their profiles.
Across the Atlantic, Kaycia Duncan, 30, has spent more than a year hunting for marketing work from her home in Buckinghamshire. She finds the silence dishearteningdisheartening: making someone lose hope or confidence — 令人沮丧的;让人灰心的, evidence of how punishing the market has become. Like Ventola, she invests roughly £30 a month in tools she hopes will sharpen her job prospects: the chances of getting a good job in the future — 就业前景: a premium service that lets her message HR managers: people in charge of hiring at a company; HR stands for Human Resources — 人力资源经理(HR) directly, plus a graphic-design subscription for producing polished CVs and portfolio work: examples of past projects shown to potential employers — 作品集;展示作品. While she waits, she has taken on temp work: short-term jobs that fill a gap until a permanent job is found — 临时工作;零工 and launched a YouTube channel chroniclingchronicle: to record in or as in a chronicle — 记录;编年史般记述 her search. Two hundred applications in, she still believes the spending was justified.
With interviews proving elusive: turning out to be hard to get or achieve — 难以求得;屡屡碰壁, Ventola took to TikTok last year, partly to externaliseexternalise: to make something external or objective — 使外在化;具象化 her own troubleshooting and partly because she suspected, correctly, that she was not alone. Her clips quickly began to rack up: build up a large number or amount of (something) — 累积;攒下(数量) hundreds of comments from other jobseekers in the same bindbind: A troublesome situation; a problem; a predicament or quandary — 困境;窘境. That response provided the spark: gave the first push that started something — 成为契机;点燃了灵感 for Rhize, the not-for-profit: (of an organization) run for a purpose other than making money — 非营利的 community she founded so job hunters could swap notes on which paid tools actually deliver. Membership has climbed past 4,000, roughly 80% in the US.
Industry observers read these stories as symptoms of a deeper rebalancingrebalancing: The act or process of restoring balance — 再平衡;重新调整. “We have seen the shift from a candidate market: a job market in which workers have the upper hand because employers compete for them — 求职者市场(求职者占主导) in the past three years, to more of an employer-driven market: a job market in which employers have the upper hand because there are more workers than open jobs — 雇主主导的市场,” says Nancy D'Onofrio, a Toronto-based director at Randstad, the multinational HR and staffing company: a company that helps other companies find workers — 人力资源外包公司;人才招聘公司. “There are far less opportunities and far more available talent, so it's a really competitive job search: a job hunt with many other strong candidates competing for the same roles — 竞争激烈的求职.” D'Onofrio points to: names (something) as a cause or example — 指出;归因于 advances in AI as a key driver, an analysis echoedecho: To repeat or reflect an idea, opinion, or sound, often in agreement or as a reverberation. — 回响;附和;重复 by Nicole Gable of LHH North America, who attributesattribute: To ascribe (something) to a given cause, reason etc — 归因于;归咎于 the volatilityvolatility: The state of being volatile — 不稳定性 to “the rapid explosion of technology: the very fast growth and spread of new technology — 技术的迅猛发展”. Few employers, Gable adds, can confidently name the skills they will need five years out.
The uncertainty has been good for career coach: a trained professional who advises someone on their career and job search — 职业教练;职业顾问. Miriam Groom, who runs a practice in Canada, says her client roster has expanded exponentiallyexponentially: Rapidly, greatly — 急剧地;飞速地. Once dominated by burnout candidates: people who feel exhausted and unhappy from too much work — 身心倦怠的求职者;工作疲惫的人, her caseloadcaseload: The workload of a person or group that handles cases; the relative volume of cases expected to be worked upon — 案件量 now splits roughly 50/50 between the burnt-out and those displaceddisplace: To force someone or something from its usual place or position; to take over the role of something. — 取代;使流离失所;移位 by layoffslayoff: A period of time when someone is unavailable for work — 休工期;停工期. She is also seeing a spike in: a sudden sharp increase in (something) — (数量的)激增;骤增 clients trying to retrainretrain: learn new skills so as to do a different job — 重新培训;转岗培训 for roles less likely to be replaced by technology, mapping current skills against jobs expected to be in demand: wanted by many employers; needed in the market — 受市场欢迎的;有需求的 for the next two decades. Sometimes, she says, the kindest advice is to abandon a target role and steer toward a different sector with stronger demand.
D'Onofrio doubts that paid tools are the answer. Her advice is unflashyunflashy: Not flashy — 不张扬的;朴实的: contact hiring managers: people inside a company who decide who to interview and hire — 招聘经理(决定面试和录用的人) directly, attend networking events: events where people meet to make professional contacts — 职业社交活动, and use the free resume-strengthening utilitiesutility: A software program designed to perform a single task or a small range of tasks, often to help manage and tune computer hardware, an operating system or application software already online. She also urges candidates to watch for scams: stay alert for dishonest schemes — 警惕骗局 when approached by career coaches or self-styled CV experts, and to investigate anyone thoroughly before handing over money. Ventola herself ends on a similar hedge. “Honestly, I don't think any of my investments were worth it if I measure them strictly in dollars,” she admits. “But what they did do was open my eyes to adjacent opportunities: chances in related but different fields or roles — 相邻领域的机会, and push me to think outside the box: think in a creative way that goes beyond the usual approach — 跳出固有思维;创新思考.”
Questions
Check your understanding
- 01
Ventola closes the article by saying her investments were not worth it 'if I measure them strictly in dollars'. What does the qualifier 'strictly in dollars' most likely imply?
- 02
Which combination of evidence from the article most directly supports D'Onofrio's claim that the market has shifted from a candidate market to an employer-driven one?
- 03
Why does the article place D'Onofrio's advice that 'candidates need not spend money' alongside the stories of Ventola and Duncan?
- 04
Argue whether the spending described in this article is best understood as a rational investment by jobseekers or as a symptom of a market that exploits anxious applicants. Use at least three pieces of evidence from the article in your answer.
Suggested length: ~100 words
- 05
Assess the claim that artificial intelligence is the central reason job hunting has become more difficult. How well does the article support this claim, and what alternative explanations does it imply?
Suggested length: ~100 words
Questions
Check your understanding
- 01
Ventola closes the article by saying her investments were not worth it 'if I measure them strictly in dollars'. What does the qualifier 'strictly in dollars' most likely imply?
- 02
Which combination of evidence from the article most directly supports D'Onofrio's claim that the market has shifted from a candidate market to an employer-driven one?
- 03
Why does the article place D'Onofrio's advice that 'candidates need not spend money' alongside the stories of Ventola and Duncan?
- 04
Argue whether the spending described in this article is best understood as a rational investment by jobseekers or as a symptom of a market that exploits anxious applicants. Use at least three pieces of evidence from the article in your answer.
Suggested length: ~100 words
- 05
Assess the claim that artificial intelligence is the central reason job hunting has become more difficult. How well does the article support this claim, and what alternative explanations does it imply?
Suggested length: ~100 words